5 Undervalued Companies for the Defensive Investor – January 2014

There are a number of great companies in the market today. By using the ModernGraham Valuation Model, I’ve selected five of the most undervalued companies reviewed by ModernGraham. Each company has been determined to be suitable for Defensive Investor according to the ModernGraham approach. This is a sample of one screen that is included in ModernGraham Stocks & Screens, our monthly publication.  Defensive Investors are defined as investors who are not able or willing to do substantial research into individual investments, and therefore need to select only the companies that present the least amount of risk. Enterprising Investors, on the other hand, are able to do substantial research and can select companies that present a moderate (though still low) amount of risk. Each company suitable for the Defensive Investor is also suitable for Enterprising Investors.

Value investors seeking to follow Benjamin Graham’s methods may also wish to review some other companies that satisfy the ModernGraham requirements while proceeding with further research of all of the following companies:

Intel Corp (INTC)

500px-Intel-logo.svgIntel Corp is a very strong company, having passed every single requirement of both the Defensive and Enterprising Investors.  In addition, the company appears to be undervalued significantly by Mr. Market.  The market is implying only 1.97% growth in the earnings, but historically the growth rate is much higher.  The EPSmg (normalized earnings) has grown from $1.06 in 2008 to an estimated $1.99 in 2013.  Further, the PEmg is only 12.21, which should be low enough to attract the attention of value investors.  As a result, potential investors should be intrigued by Intel and proceed with further research of the company.  We last reviewed this company on November 6, 2013 (look for an updated valuation in the next couple weeks), and valued it at $76.44.  Since then, it has risen about 3%, but it is still significantly undervalued.

Deere & Co. (DE)

500px-John_Deere_logo.svgDeere & Co. is a strong company and passes the requirements for both the Defensive Investor and the Enterprising Investor.  The only knocks on the company in that regard is that the PB ratio is a little high, but that is not enough to eliminate the company from further review by either investor type.  The ModernGraham valuation model also views Deere & Co. favorably, as a result of the strong growth the company has demonstrated over the historical period.  The company’s EPSmg (normalized earnings) have grown from $3.83 in 2008 to an estimated $6.86 for 2013.  This level of growth surpasses the market’s implied growth rate of only 2.06%, and as a result it would appear the company is undervalued at this time.  Defensive Investors and Enterprising Investors should take a look at our review of Caterpillar Inc. (ModernGraham Valuation) as they do further research to determine whether Deere & Co. would be suitable for their individual portfolios.  We last reviewed Deere & Co. on December 16, 2013, and valued it at $264.16.  Since then, it has dropped in price about 0.7%, so it is an even better value today.

AFLAC Incorporated (AFL)

500px-Aflac.svgAFLAC is a very attractive company, passing all of the requirements for both the Defensive Investor and the Enterprising Investor.  The company has a strong balance sheet, good dividend history, and solid earnings growth.  Defensive Investors and Enterprising Investors should feel very comfortable continuing with their research into the company.  From a valuation standpoint, the strong earnings growth from an EPSmg (normalized earnings) of $2.91 in 2008 to an estimated $5.56 in 2013.  Such growth far outpaces the 1.43% the market is implying.  The company appears significantly undervalued by the ModernGraham valuation model.  Defensive Investors and Enterprising Investors should undertake further research to determine if the company would be suitable for their individual investment portfolios, while keeping in mind the 7 Key Tips to Value Investing.  We valued AFLAC at $188.64 on November 20, 2013, and it has dropped in price about 4.6% since then.  It remains a solid value.

JP Morgan Chase (JPM)

500px-J_P_Morgan_Chase_Logo_2008_1.svgJP Morgan Chase is a very intriguing financial company, based on its earnings growth over the last 10 years.  The company passes all of the tests required for both the Defensive and Enterprising Investor because it has strong financials.  From a valuation perspective, the company fares well in the ModernGraham valuation model after achieving significant growth in EPSmg (normalized earnings) of $2.62 in 2008 to an estimated $4.48 in 2013.  The market is currently implying further growth of only 2.00%, which should be easily beatable by such a large bank.  As a result, investors of all kinds should be interested in JP Morgan Chase and should do further research to determine whether it would be a suitable investment for them individually.  The last ModernGraham valuation of JP Morgan Chase was at $143.27 on November 11, 2013.  It has since risen in value 3.8%, but it still appears to be greatly undervalued.

Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC)

500px-Wells_Fargo_Bank.svgAfter looking at the fundamentals, Wells Fargo remains an extremely intriguing company that value investors seeking to follow Benjamin Graham’s methods should be interested in researching further.  The company passes all of the requirements for both the Defensive Investor and the Enterprising Investor.  Investors should be eager to compare Wells Fargo to its competitors by reviewing the ModernGraham valuations of JP Morgan Chase (JPM) and Bank of America (BAC).  From a valuation side of things, the company fares well after growing its EPSmg (normalized earnings) from $1.73 in 2009 to $3.17 for 2013.  It is particularly noteworthy that the earnings are even greater now than they were just before the crisis, a time when banks were “booming.”  The market is currently implying a growth rate of 3.01%, but based on the historical performance of the company that growth rate should easily be beat.  As a result, the company’s intrinsic value appears much higher than the market price, and the company appears to be undervalued.  Wells Fargo was reviewed on January 26, 2014 and valued at $106.13.  It has risen a little over 1% since then but remains a great value.

What do you think?  Are these companies a good value for Defensive Investors?  Is there a company you like better?  Leave a comment on our Facebook page or mention @ModernGraham on Twitter to discuss.

Disclaimer:  The author held a position in Deere & Co. (DE), but did not hold a position in any other company mentioned in this article at the time of publication and had no intention of changing those holdings within the next 72 hours.

3 thoughts on “5 Undervalued Companies for the Defensive Investor – January 2014

  1. James Crisafulli says:

    Thank you

  2. Curious Al says:

    End of the day, I’d agree on the bulk of what you are saying. And I think its refreshing to establish something for a regular investor to do proper valuations and create consistent, objective means to view investment opportunities.

    That said, don’t you find the valuations you are placing on these companies require some sort attention? I notice that the valuations change mightily from quarter to quarter, and are at extremes to how the market – or any other established firm – is valuing these companies.

    Perhaps I am misreading or misinterpreting what it is you are suggesting and its not part of my persona to be an Internet troll. But I have a hard time reading that DE is valued at $265.

    1. Al,

      Thanks for the comment. I actually think the valuation model comes out fairly consistent as a whole. When you look at the Glance at the Dow, the model indicates the market is fairly valued or slightly undervalued (depending on the size of your margin of safety). I think that comports with my own observations about the market. We’ve seen a rise and may be due for a pull-back, but it doesn’t quite seem imminent.

      I also find that for the most part the valuations tend to be pretty stable. Yes, there will be some changes from quarter to quarter as the company’s earnings results may be different than estimated, but I certainly don’t think wide swings in value are to be expected from the model. That is especially true for companies that have reliable earnings estimates.

      As for DE being valued at $265, I think it is more important to pay attention to the overall result. I doubt DE will see the market bring the price up to that level any time soon, but the fact is that it appears to be significantly undervalued by the market. We can’t predict where Mr. Market will take the price, but we can use an objective method of valuation to determine if Mr. Market is undervaluing or overvaluing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous article

Abbvie (ABBV) Annual Valuation