Tidewater Inc. Annual Valuation – 2014 $TDW

tidewater_logoBenjamin Graham taught that Intelligent Investors must do a thorough fundamental analysis of investment opportunities to determine their intrinsic value and inherent risk.  This is best done by utilizing a systematic approach to analysis that will provide investors with a sense of how a specific company compares to another company or by reviewing the 5 Undervalued Companies for the Enterprising Investor Near 52 Week Lows.  By using the ModernGraham method one can review a company’s historical accomplishments and determine an intrinsic value that can be compared across industries.  What follows is a specific look at how Tidewater Inc. (TDW) fares in the ModernGraham valuation model.

Company Profile (obtained from Google Finance): Tidewater Inc. provides offshore supply vessels and marine support services to the offshore energy industry through the operation of marine service vessels. The Company conducts its operations through wholly owned United States and international subsidiaries. It provides offshore vessel services in support of all phases of offshore exploration, field development and production, including towing of, and anchor handling for, mobile offshore drilling units; transporting supplies and personnel necessary to sustain drilling, workover and production activities; offshore construction, ROV operations and seismic support, and a variety of specialized services, such as pipe and cable laying. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had 328 vessels (of which 10 were owned by joint ventures, 51 were stacked and two were withdrawn from service) servicing the global energy industry. The Company operates in four segments: Americas, Asia/Pacific, Middle East/North Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa/Europe.

TDW Chart

TDW data by YCharts

Defensive Investor – must pass at least 6 of the following 7 tests: Score = 5/7

  1. Adequate Size of Enterprise – market capitalization of at least $2 billion – PASS
  2. Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition – current ratio greater than 2 – PASS
  3. Earnings Stability – positive earnings per share for at least 10 straight years - PASS
  4. Dividend Record – has paid a dividend for at least 10 straight years - PASS
  5. Earnings Growth – earnings per share has increased by at least 1/3 over the last 10 years using 3 year averages at beginning and end of period – FAIL
  6. Moderate PEmg ratio – PEmg is less than 20 - FAIL
  7. Moderate Price to Assets – PB ratio is less than 2.5 or PB x PEmg is less than 50 – PASS

Enterprising Investor – must pass at least 4 of the following 5 tests or be suitable for a defensive investor: Score = 3/5

  1. Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition, Part 1 – current ratio greater than 1.5 – PASS
  2. Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition, Part 2 – Debt to Net Current Assets ratio less than 1.1 – FAIL
  3. Earnings Stability – positive earnings per share for at least 5 years – PASS
  4. Dividend Record – currently pays a dividend - PASS
  5. Earnings growth – EPSmg greater than 5 years ago - FAIL

Valuation Summary

Key Data:

Recent Price $54.80
MG Value $0.00
MG Opinion Overvalued
Value Based on 3% Growth $39.09
Value Based on 0% Growth $22.92
Market Implied Growth Rate 5.91%
Net Current Asset Value (NCAV) -$27.87
PEmg 20.33
Current Ratio 2.04
PB Ratio 1.02

Balance Sheet – 3/31/2014

Current Assets $820,200,000
Current Liabilities $401,700,000
Total Debt $1,505,400,000
Total Assets $4,885,800,000
Intangible Assets $283,700,000
Total Liabilities $2,206,400,000
Outstanding Shares 49,730,000

Earnings Per Share

2014 $2.82
2013 $3.03
2012 $1.70
2011 $2.05
2010 $5.02
2009 $7.89
2008 $6.43
2007 $6.31
2006 $4.07
2005 $1.78
2004 $0.73

Earnings Per Share – ModernGraham

2014 $2.70
2013 $3.07
2012 $3.60
2011 $4.88
2010 $6.18
2009 $6.27

Dividend History

TDW Dividend Chart

TDW Dividend data by YCharts


Tidewater is not suitable for either the Defensive Investor or the Enterprising Investor at this time.  The Defensive Investor has concerns with the lack of sufficient earnings growth over the last ten years and the high PEmg ratio while the Enterprising Investor is concerned with the high level of debt relative to net current assets and the lack of earnings growth over the last five years.  As a result, value investors following the ModernGraham approach based on Benjamin Graham’s methods should seek other opportunities.  As for a valuation, the company appears significantly overvalued after seeing its EPSmg (normalized earnings) drop from $6.18 in 2010 to $2.70 for 2014.  This demonstrated shrinking of earnings does not support the market’s implied estimate of 5.91% earnings growth and leads the ModernGraham valuation model, which is based on Benjamin Graham’s formula, to return an estimate of intrinsic value well below the market price.

The next part of the analysis is up to individual investors, and requires discussion of the company’s prospects.  What do you think?  What value would you put on Tidewater Inc. (TDW)?  Where do you see the company going in the future?  Is there a company you like better?  Leave a comment on our Facebook page or mention @ModernGraham on Twitter to discuss.

Be sure to review the previous ModernGraham Valuations of Tidewater Inc. (TDW)!

Disclaimer:  The author did not hold a position in Tidewater Inc. (TDW) or any other company mentioned in this article at the time of publication and had no intention of changing that position within the next 72 hours.

Logo taken from wikipedia; this article is not affiliated with the company in any manner.






Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.