Benjamin Graham taught that Intelligent Investors must do a thorough fundamental analysis of investment opportunities to determine their intrinsic value and inherent risk. Â This isÂ best done by utilizing a systematic approach to analysis that will provide investors with a sense of how a specific company compares to another companyÂ or by reviewing theÂ 5 Most Undervalued Companies for the Defensive Investor – AprilÂ 2015.Â By using theÂ ModernGraham methodÂ one can review a company’s historical accomplishments and determine an intrinsic value that can be compared across industries. Â What follows is a specific look at how EQT Corporation (EQT)Â fares in theÂ ModernGraham valuation model.
Company ProfileÂ (obtained fromÂ Google Finance): EQT Corporation (EQT) is an integrated energy company focused on the Appalachian area natural gas production, gathering, and transmission. The Company conducts its business through two business segments: EQT Production and EQT Midstream. EQT Production is a natural gas producer in the Appalachian Basin with 8.3 trillion cubic feet equivalent (Tcfe) of proved natural gas, NGLs and crude oil reserves across 3.6 million acres, including approximately 580,000 gross acres in the Marcellus play. EQT Productionâ€™s properties are located primarily in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky and Virginia. EQT Midstream provides gathering, transmission and storage services for the Companyâ€™s produced gas and for the independent third parties across the Appalachian Basin.
Defensive Investor – must pass at least 6 of the following 7 tests: Score = 4/7
- Adequate Size of Enterprise – market capitalization of at least $2 billion -Â PASS
- Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition – current ratio greater than 2 -Â PASS
- Earnings Stability – positive earnings per share for at least 10 straight years -Â PASS
- Dividend Record – has paid a dividend for at least 10 straight years -Â PASS
- Earnings Growth – earnings per share has increased by at least 1/3 over the last 10 years using 3 year averages at beginning and end of period -Â FAIL
- Moderate PEmg ratio – PEmg is less than 20 -Â FAIL
- Moderate Price to Assets – PB ratio is less than 2.5 or PB x PEmg is less than 50 -Â FAIL
Enterprising Investor – must pass at least 4Â of the following 5 tests or be suitable for a defensive investor: Score = 3/5
- Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition, Part 1 – current ratio greater than 1.5 -Â PASS
- Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition, Part 2 – Debt to Net Current Assets ratio less than 1.1 -Â FAIL
- Earnings Stability – positive earnings per share for at least 5 years -Â PASS
- Dividend Record – currently pays a dividend -Â PASS
- Earnings growth – EPSmg greater than 5 years ago -Â FAIL
|Value Based on 3% Growth||$24.89|
|Value Based on 0% Growth||$14.59|
|Market Implied Growth Rate||22.21%|
|Net Current Asset Value (NCAV)||-$37.44|
Balance Sheet – March 2015
Earnings Per Share
Earnings Per ShareÂ – ModernGraham
EQT CorporationÂ is not suitableÂ for either the Defensive Investor or the Enterprising Investor. Â The Defensive Investor is concerned with the low level of earnings growth over the last ten years,Â and the poor PEmg and PB ratios. Â The Enterprising Investor is concerned with the level of debt relative to the net current assets and the lack of earnings growth over the last five years. Â As a result, value investorsÂ following the ModernGraham approach based on Benjamin Graham’s methods should exploreÂ other opportunities. Â As for a valuation,Â the company appears to be overvalued after seeingÂ its EPSmg (normalized earnings) drop from $2.13 in 2011 to only an estimated $1.72 for 2015. Â This level of growth does not support the market’s implied estimate of 22.21% growth, leading the ModernGrahamÂ valuation model, based on Benjamin Graham’s formula, to return an estimate of intrinsic value well belowÂ the price.
The next part of the analysis is up to individual investors, and requires discussion of the company’s prospects. Â What do you think? Â What value would you put on EQT Corporation (EQT)? Â Where do you see the company going in the future? Â Is there a company you like better? Â Leave aÂ comment on ourÂ Facebook pageÂ or mentionÂ @ModernGrahamÂ on Twitter to discuss.
Disclaimer: Â The author did not hold aÂ position in any company mentioned in this articleÂ at the time of publication and had no intention of changing that position within the next 72 hours. Â Logo taken from Wikipedia for the sole purpose of identifying the company; this article is not affiliated with the company in any manner.