REITs often attract a great deal of investors because of their strong cash flows and dividends, and those investors often overlook other parts of the business, choosing to analyze the company under a different set of criteria than companies in other sectors. Â This can create a problem in that it becomes difficult to compare a REIT to an industrial, which is fine if you use the typical top-down approach to stock selection; however, a top-down approach invites speculation in the fact that you are theorizing which sector will perform well going forward. Â Benjamin Graham taught that we should avoid speculation as much as possible, which is why it is critical to develop a system for analyzing companies that will allow them to be compared across industries. Â This isÂ best done by utilizing a systematic approach to analysis that will provide investors with a sense of how a specific company compares to another investment opportunity. Â By using theÂ ModernGraham methodÂ one can review a company’s historical accomplishments and determine an intrinsic value that can be compared across industries. Â What follows is a specific look at how Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) fares in theÂ ModernGraham valuation model.
Company ProfileÂ (obtained fromÂ Google Finance): Kimco Realty Corporation is a self-administered real estate investment trust (REIT), which owns and operates neighborhood and community shopping centers. The Company has interests in 852 shopping center properties, aggregating 124.5 million square feet of gross leasable area (GLA), and 575 other property interests, through the Companyâ€™s equity investments and other real estate investments, which are located in 42 states in the United States and also in Puerto Rico, Canada, Mexico, Chile and Peru. The Companyâ€™s ownership interests in real estate consist of its portfolios where the Company owns an economic interest, such as properties in the Companyâ€™s investment real estate management programs, where the Company partners with institutional investors and also retains management. The Companyâ€™s tenants include TJX Companies, The Home Depot, Wal-Mart, Bed Bath & Beyond and Kohlâ€™s.
Defensive Investor – must pass at least 6 of the following 7 tests: Score = 4/7
- Adequate Size of Enterprise – market capitalization of at least $2 billion – PASS
- Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition – current ratio greater than 2 -Â PASS
- Earnings Stability – positive earnings per share for at least 10 straight years -Â FAIL
- Dividend Record – has paid a dividend for at least 10 straight years -Â PASS
- Earnings Growth – earnings per share has increased by at least 1/3 over the last 10 years using 3 year averages at beginning and end of period -Â FAIL
- Moderate PEmg ratio – PEmg is less than 20 -Â FAIL
- Moderate Price to Assets – PB ratio is less than 2.5 or PB x PEmg is less than 50 -Â PASS
Enterprising Investor – must pass at least 4 of the following 5 tests or be suitable for a defensive investor: Score = 4/5
- Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition, Part 1 – current ratio greater than 1.5 -Â PASS
- Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition, Part 2 – Debt to Net Current Assets ratio less than 1.1 – FAIL
- Earnings Stability – positive earnings per share for at least 5 years -Â PASS
- Dividend Record – currently pays a dividend – PASS
- Earnings growth – EPSmg greater than 5 years ago – PASS
|Value Based on 3% Growth||$7.92|
|Value Based on 0% Growth||$4.64|
|Market Implied Growth Rate||18.23%|
|Net Current Asset Value (NCAV)||-$11.66|
Balance Sheet – DecemberÂ 2014
Earnings Per Share
Earnings Per Share – ModernGraham
Kimco RealtyÂ is suitable for the Enterprising Investor but not for the more conservative Defensive Investor. Â The Defensive Investor is concerned with the lack of earnings stability or growth over the last ten years, and the high PEmg ratio. Â The Enterprising Investor is only concerned with the high level of debt relative to the net current assets. Â As a result, Enterprising Investors following the ModernGraham approach should feel comfortable proceeding with further research into the company. Â From a valuation side of things, the company appears to be overvalued afterÂ growing its EPSmg (normalized earnings) from $0.52Â in 2010 to only $0.55Â in 2014. Â This level of growth does not support the market’s implied estimate of 18.23% annual earnings growth over the next 7-10 years, leading the ModernGraham valuation model to return an estimate of intrinsic value falling below the current price. Â As a result, the company is considered to be overvalued at this time.
The next part of the analysis is up to individual investors, and requires discussion of the company’s prospects. Â What do you think? Â What value would you put on Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM)? Â Where do you see the company going in the future? Â Is there a company you like better? Â Leave aÂ comment on ourÂ Facebook pageÂ or mentionÂ @ModernGrahamÂ on Twitter to discuss.
Disclaimer: Â The author did not hold a position in Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) or any other company mentioned in the article at the time of publication and had no intention of changing that position within the next 72 hours. Â Logo taken from wikipedia; this article is not affiliated with the company in any manner.