Search results for: “KIRK”

  • Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd Valuation – August 2018 $TSE-KL

    Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd Valuation – August 2018 $TSE-KL

    Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd is suitable for the Enterprising Investor but not the more conservative Defensive Investor. The Defensive Investor is concerned with the insufficient earnings stability or growth over the last ten years, and the poor dividend history, and the high PEmg and PB ratios.

  • Kirkland’s Inc Valuation – June 2018 $KIRK

    Kirkland’s Inc Valuation – June 2018 $KIRK

    Kirkland’s, Inc. does not satisfy the requirements of either the Enterprising Investor or the more conservative Defensive Investor. The Defensive Investor is concerned with the small size, low current ratio, insufficient earnings growth over the last ten years, and the poor dividend history, and the high PEmg ratio.

  • Kirkland Lakes Gold Ltd Valuation – Initial Coverage $TSE:KL

    Kirkland Lakes Gold Ltd Valuation – Initial Coverage $TSE:KL

    KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD LTD does not satisfy the requirements of either the Enterprising Investor or the more conservative Defensive Investor. The Defensive Investor is concerned with the insufficient earnings stability or growth over the last ten years, the poor dividend history, and the high PEmg ratio.

  • Kirkland’s Inc Valuation – Initial Coverage $KIRK

    Kirkland’s Inc Valuation – Initial Coverage $KIRK

    Kirkland’s, Inc. does not satisfy the requirements of either the Enterprising Investor or the more conservative Defensive Investor. The Defensive Investor is concerned with the small size, low current ratio, insufficient earnings stability over the last ten years, and the poor dividend history.

  • Freeport-McMoRan Inc Valuation – March 2019 $FCX

    Freeport-McMoRan Inc Valuation – March 2019 $FCX

    Freeport-McMoRan Inc does not satisfy the requirements of either the Enterprising Investor or the more conservative Defensive Investor. The Defensive Investor is concerned with the insufficient earnings stability or growth over the last ten years, and the poor dividend history, and the high PEmg and PB ratios.

  • Newmont Mining Corp Valuation – January 2019 $NEM

    Newmont Mining Corp Valuation – January 2019 $NEM

    Newmont Mining Corp is suitable for the Enterprising Investor but not the more conservative Defensive Investor. The Defensive Investor is concerned with the insufficient earnings stability or growth over the last ten years, and the high PEmg ratio.

  • SunCoke Energy Inc Valuation – September 2018 $SXC

    SunCoke Energy Inc Valuation – September 2018 $SXC

    SunCoke Energy Inc does not satisfy the requirements of either the Enterprising Investor or the more conservative Defensive Investor. The Defensive Investor is concerned with the small size, low current ratio, insufficient earnings stability or growth over the last ten years, and the poor dividend history, and the high PEmg ratio.

  • Allegheny Technologies Inc Valuation – September 2018 $ATI

    Allegheny Technologies Inc Valuation – September 2018 $ATI

    Allegheny Technologies Incorporated does not satisfy the requirements of either the Enterprising Investor or the more conservative Defensive Investor. The Defensive Investor is concerned with the insufficient earnings stability or growth over the last ten years, and the poor dividend history, and the high PEmg and PB ratios.

  • Canadian Tire Corp Ltd Valuation – August 2018 $TSE:CTC.A

    Canadian Tire Corp Ltd Valuation – August 2018 $TSE:CTC.A

    Canadian Tire Corporation Limited Class A qualifies for both the Defensive Investor and the Enterprising Investor. The Defensive Investor is only initially concerned with the low current ratio.

  • SSR Mining Inc Valuation – August 2018 $TSE-SSRM

    SSR Mining Inc Valuation – August 2018 $TSE-SSRM

    SSR Mining Inc does not satisfy the requirements of either the Enterprising Investor or the more conservative Defensive Investor. The Defensive Investor is concerned with the small size, insufficient earnings stability or growth over the last ten years, and the poor dividend history, and the high PEmg ratio.